Posted by Chris EdwardsMost people know about the individual mandate in the new health care bill, but the bill contained another mandate that could be far more costly.A few wording changes to the tax code’s section 6041 regarding 1099 reporting were slipped into the 2000-page health legislation. The changes will force millions of businesses to issue hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of additional IRS Form 1099s every year. It appears to be a costly, anti-business nightmare.Under current law, businesses are required to issue 1099s in a limited set of situations, such as when paying outside consultants. The health care bill includes a vast expansion in this information reporting requirement in an attempt to raise revenue for an increasingly rapacious Congress.In a recent summary, tax information firm RIA notes the types of transactions covered by the new 1099 rules:The 2010 Health Care Act adds “amounts in consideration for property” (Code Sec. 6041(a) as amended by 2010 Health Care Act §9006(b)(1)) and “gross proceeds” (Code Sec. 6041(a) as amended by 2010 Health Care Act §9006(b)(2)) to the pre-2010 Health Care Act categories of payments for which an information return to IRS will be required if the $600 aggregate payment threshold is met in a tax year for any one payee. Thus, Congress says that for payments made after 2011, the term “payments” includes gross proceeds paid in consideration for property or services.I would say "What were they thinking?" but obviously they were not thinking, just acting. I would really like to know who all actually wrote this bill and how many years it took. Read it all.
Friday, April 30, 2010
I'm beginning to feel sorry for those working for the IRS
Tigerhawk has a link to this article in Cato@ Liberty, a blog from the Cato Institute: